PERCEIVED 'METRIC' EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE DURING THE PME

When people discuss the 'metric' expansion of space or the qualities of our 'expanding' universe the terms seem easily understood, and although they are accurate the true nature of the intended definition often needs clarifying for most people. The metric expansion of space means literally the measure of an increasing distance between distant objects in the universe, however by definition there is no outer framework for the universe to be expanding within, so therefore the universe as we know it is expanding, but in fact expanding into nothing.

It is an intrinsic expansion—that is, it is defined by the relative separation of parts of the universe and not by motion "outward" into preexisting space. (In other words, the universe is not expanding "into" anything outside of itself).

Metric expansion is a key feature of Big Bang cosmology (associated with the creation of the PME and the catalyst change during the PPE) and is modeled mathematically with the FLRW metric. This model is valid in the present era only at relatively large scales (roughly the scale of galactic superclusters and above). At smaller scales matter has clumped together under the influence of gravitational attraction and these clumps do not individually expand, though they continue to recede from one another. The expansion is due partly to inertia (that is, the matter in the universe is separating because it was separating in the past) and partly to a repulsive force of unknown nature, which may be a cosmological constant. Inertia dominated the expansion in the early universe, and according to the ΛCDM model the cosmological constant will dominate in the future. In the present era they contribute in roughly equal proportions.

While special relativity constrains objects in the universe from moving faster than the speed of light with respect to each other, there is no such theoretical constraint when space itself is expanding. It is thus possible for two very distant objects to be moving away from each other at a speed greater than the speed of light (meaning that one cannot be observed from the other). The size of the observable universe could thus be smaller than the entire universe.

It is also possible for a distance to exceed the speed of light times the age of the universe, which means that light from one part of space generated near the beginning of the Universe might still be arriving at distant locations (hence the cosmic microwave background radiation). These details are a frequent source of confusion among amateurs and even professional physicists.^[1]

So we see here that in fact the universe is not expanding, but objects nonetheless can increase their distance from one another, and when we talk about the fabric of our reality this includes not only unique instances of Pure Material Energy, or PME, such as planets, stars, moons, objects etc, but the actual distance itself - the space between galaxies that we perceive as empty is included as a form of PME and therefore can expand within its own self-defined parameters. This means that our reality is not expanding into anything actually by its own definition, there is simply more space at later times than at earlier times.

Spacetime is highly curved at cosmological scales, and as a result the expansion of the universe is inherently general relativistic; it cannot be understood with special relativity alone. The images to the right show two views of the large-scale geometry of the universe according to the ΛCDMcosmological time of 700 million years after the big bang; the wide end is a cosmological time of 18 billion years, where one can see the beginning of the accelerating expansion which eventually dominates in this model. The purple grid lines mark off cosmological time at intervals of one billion years from the big bang. The cyan grid lines mark off comoving distance at intervals of one billion light years. Note that the circular curling of the surface is an artifact of the embedding with no physical significance; space does not actually curl around on itself. (A similar effect can be seen in the tubular shape of the pseudosphere.) cosmological model. Two of the dimensions of space are omitted, leaving one dimension of space and one of time. The narrow circular end of the diagram corresponds to a

The brown line on the diagram is the worldline of the Earth (or, at earlier times, of the matter which condensed to form the Earth). The yellow line is the worldline of the most distant known quasar. The red line is the path of a light beam emitted by the quasar about 13 billion years ago and reaching the Earth in the present day. The orange line shows the present-day distance between the quasar and the Earth, about 28 billion light years.

According to the equivalence principle of general relativity, the rules of special relativity are locally valid in small regions of spacetime that are approximately flat. In particular, light always travels locally at the speed c; in our diagram, this means that light beams always make an angle of 45° with the local grid lines. It does not follow, however, that light travels a distance ct in a time t, as the red worldline illustrates. While it always moves locally at c, its time in transit (about 13 billion years) is not related to the distance traveled in any simple way. In fact the distance traveled is inherently ambiguous because of the changing scale of the universe. Nevertheless, we can single out two distances which appear to be physically meaningful: the distance between the Earth and the quasar when the light was emitted, and the distance between them in the present era. The former distance is about 4 billion light years, much smaller than ct. The latter distance (shown by the orange line) is about 28 billion light years, much larger than ct. Note that the light took much longer than 4 billion years to reach us though it was emitted from only 4 billion light years away. In fact, we can see from the diagram that the light was moving away from the Earth when it was first emitted, in the sense that the metric distance to the Earth increased with cosmological time for the first few billion years of its travel time. None of this surprising behavior originates from a special property of metric expansion, but simply from local principles of special relativity integrated over a curved surface.

So, with all units within the universe essentially in a seemingly constant state of rearrangement we must look to the forces at work that push this chaotic nature forward, and that force will in turn reveal the nature of a universal constant. As we all know now that force is entropy, ever accruing. Science was focused on the nature of the universe for so long that it failed to properly identify and examine entropy as the force acting outside of all other sub-laws governing our reality and the cosmos. The effects of entropy can be seen and measured as a self-referencing form of perceived metric expansion, but the effects between the very nature of the force acting on our world is what science is almost exclusively focused on now after initial measurements into the nature of the PME and its frictions led to the realization that the Earth would then be destroyed entirely on April 27th, 2010 after generating a series of Hz patterns that result in global tectonic vibrations so violent that they will decimate the Earth's structural integrity and release a burst of potential energy great enough to literally destroy the entire planet in a disastrous few instances.

The first general relativistic models predicted that a universe which was dynamical and contained ordinary gravitational matter would contract rather than expand. Einstein's first proposal for a solution to this problem involved adding ever increasing entropy values as a cosmological constant into his theories to balance out the contraction, in order to obtain a static universe solution. But in 1922 Alexander Friedman derived a set of equations known as the Friedmann equations, showing that the universe might expand and presenting the expansion speed in this case.^[8] The observations of Edwin Hubble in 1929 suggested that distant galaxies were all apparently moving away from us, so that many scientists came to accept that the universe was expanding. It wasn't until November 9th, 2009 that scientists fully understood the context within which to execute these equations and thereby deduced a finite timeline for our universe. It was this initial timeline discovery that led to the scientific revelations concerning April 27th, 2010.

The expansion of space is sometimes described as a force which acts to push objects apart. Though this is an accurate description of the effect of the cosmological constant, it is not an accurate picture of the phenomenon of expansion in general. For much of the universe's history the expansion has been due mainly to inertia. The matter in the very early universe was flying apart for unknown reasons (most likely as a result of cosmic inflation) and has simply continued to do so, though at an ever-decreasing rate due to the attractive effect of gravity. In addition to slowing the overall expansion, gravity causes local clumping of matter into stars and galaxies. These stars and galaxies do not subsequently expand, there being no force compelling them to do so. There is no essential difference between the inertial expansion of the universe and the inertial separation of nearby objects in a vacuum; the former is simply a large-scale extrapolation of the latter. A uniform local "explosion" of matter can be locally described by the FLRW geometry, the same geometry which describes the expansion of the universe as a whole. In particular, general relativity predicts that light will move at the speed c with respect to the local motion of the exploding matter, a phenomenon analogous to frame dragging.

This situation changes somewhat with the introduction of entropy as a cosmological constant. A cosmological constant has the effect of a repulsive force between objects which is proportional (not inversely proportional) to distance. Unlike inertia it actively "pulls" on objects which have clumped together under the influence of gravity, and even on individual atoms. However this does not cause the objects to grow steadily or to disintegrate; unless they are very weakly bound, they will simply settle into an equilibrium state which is slightly (undetectably) larger than it would otherwise have been. As the universe expands and the matter in it thins, the gravitational attraction decreases (since it is proportional to the density), while the cosmological repulsion increases; thus the ultimate fate of the ΛCDM universe is a near vacuum expanding at an ever increasing rate under the influence of the cosmological constant. However the only locally visible effect of the accelerating expansion is the disappearance (by runaway redshift) of distant galaxies; gravitationally bound objects like the Milky Way do not expand.

Even if the universe is finite, it is possible to make more space without having any "outside" space. A common analogy is to consider that it is possible to increase the surface area of a balloon by inflating it, without needing any additional balloons to facilitate the expansion. However, a balloon is a two-dimensional surface expanding into a three-dimensional space. There is not theorized to be a higher-dimensional space into which three-dimensional space is expanding; more of it simply appears as if by stretching.^[7]

This finite universe theory supposes that the universe has no "edge", but wraps around on itself. If it were possible to travel the entire length of the universe without going faster than light, one would simply end up back in the same place, not unlike going all the way around the surface of the balloon (or a planet like the Earth).

The notion of "more space" is local, not global; we do not know how much space there is in total. The embedding diagram has been arbitrarily cut off a few billion years past the Earth and the quasar, but it could be extended indefinitely, even infinitely, provided we imagine it as curling into a "spiral of constant radius" rather than a circle. Even if the overall spatial extent is infinite we still say that space is expanding because, locally, the characteristic distance between objects is increasing.

IMAGES FROM MYSTERIOUS VIDEO FURTHER POINT TO APRIL 27TH

Below are still images taken from the video that surfaced last month. They can be seen flashing by between 00:11:20 and 00:11:22 as the man in the video is running past a fallen tree. These images so clearly depict '4-27' as being carved into the tree that it brings up a host of questions and concerns as to the origin and nature of this video.



What is the message here? This seems to point to a message more directly focused on the predictions of April 27th and less on the actual content of the video involving a group of hikers being chased by an unidentified creature.

One theory that has been spoken at length on involves this video coming to us in fact from the 'future' as it were, having been transmitted during the moments of the Earth's destruction. This scenario necessitates the electronic data of the digital video file being in flux (such as being saved, sent, or re-partitioned on a disk) at the moment a great expenditure of energy is released. This energy would have to be equal to an explosion of approximately 13.27 million megatons with a disruptive blast pattern that would then travel at over the speed of sound, or 343 meters per second (1,125 ft/s). It has been pointed out that the store of energy inherent in the Earth is well beyond the minimum required to achieve these results, and upon its structural implosion that energy would all be released at once.

For this scenario to involve the transference of the data as energy however a number of other factors must be present as well, such as the energy pattern of the explosion caused by the Earth must match metrically and diametrically the a-physical patterning of supermassive blackhole whose center can be defined as residing along the same y-axis as the nexus of the blast (the Earth's core). Furthermore, an astral stream must be present and moving with inertia slight enough to be totally disrupted by the resulting blast. If the data was in flux and thus represented as energy via a series of Hz, and the above conditions existed, the data would then have to be integrated into the astral stream at the exact moment of the Earth's destructive energy release and redirected adequately to find itself briefly outside of linear time's boundaries. Upon inevitably re-merging with common boundaries of time and space it would then continue its travel un-phased starting from whatever point in time in emerged in.

By that theory, even if the astral stream that then contains the data emerged at what we know as 1 BCE it would be available and unchanged verily at any point thereafter, so when mankind eventually developed receivers capable of searching and filtering through chaotic data information in search of intelligible representations of modern data configurations, this would in fact turn up.

That is one explanation, and although it requires numerous factors all operating within a very small margin of error, it is possible. The more likely option is that this video was produced by someone with knowledge of the events of April 27th and likely disseminated as a form of disinformation or as an attempt to raise awareness of the event.

However, as with all things, we cannot put any option to bed without concrete evidence, and in this case that is not something we have much of. Please, watch the video again, look at the images, write in if you have any further information.