4-27-2010.com - VIDEOS RECOVERED

Thanks to your help we were able to recover the video blogs Patrick Danville did for 4-27-2010.com that were lost when they were attacked by hackers earlier this month. I have hosted them on my youtube account but we are missing a few, if anyone has episode 4 or 5 of 'Voice of the People' please let someone know so we can get that up.

Time is running short. So many things seem fleeting, so much time passes each day it seems. April 27th is coming soon and I myself am at work most of the time on a small craft that I hope will facilitate in creating my spiritual backup. Although I still profess that this blog is strictly one of unbiased science I should disclose that in light of recent events I have become an initiate in the Church of Fundamental Absence. Given their scientific approach to the concept of life and soul I feel obligated to take their methods into consideration and have begun a journey I hope will take me to the furthest reaches of scientific knowledge, and beyond.

Here are the videos -

#1 - 12.19.09


#2 - 1.1.10


#3 - 1.4.10


#4
---- CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE COPIES OF EPISODES 4 OR 5!!
#5

#6 - 3.9.10


It is interesting to watch Patrick now. I have known him only a short time it seems and worked with him a great deal in that time, but during our work together I have noticed the change that these videos bring to light - that we are all becoming more desperate. Less than a month now, science will save us, I just know it. Still, we must all find hope in what we can...

IMPOSTER VIDEO!!

We have all been following the news on the 'Mysterious Video from April 27th' as it develops, but this is something we did not expect -

Someone on the GLP message boards found the same video labeled as a promotional trailer for the movie 'Cloverfield 2', however upon reviewing the footage there are a number of seconds cut out from various places.



If you notice a couple jumps in the video will clue you in right away, but here is my analysis -

First of all, the video is 3 seconds shorter, which is a dead giveaway that something has been edited from the original, and that the video we have been focused on is that original (since it has the extra time intact).

Where did the missing time go? Well for one the frames with the still images I have previously posted on this site are MISSING! Entirely gone.

Then you will notice a jump when the man says '2010' in the original video. SOMEONE HAS CUT OUT THE PARTS OF THIS VIDEO THAT RELATE IT TO APRIL 27th!!

Lastly I compared this video side by side and noticed one more cut starting at right about :40 seconds in the original video... Someone else on GLP noticed the same thing apparently and their link was taken down by admin before others could take a look, anyone care to take a look with me at what this might hold?

Other than that it looks like the good people at 4-27-2010.com have gotten most of their website back up after the attack. If anyone still has archived video blogs of theirs that would be a great help in getting them back online.

Sorry this post is related to the same video, I just can't seem to escape it! Thank you for your support, keep the emails coming, until next time...

4-27-2010.COM IS ATTACKED BY UNKOWN GROUP

Last night the website 4-27-2010.com was attacked by an unidentified group of hackers that wiped their entire site clean and deleted all information in the message boards. As many people know their message boards were a fertile ground for new ideas and hope for a continued human existence. It is believed the goal of the hacker attack was to erase all record of the information on the message boards, and for now it seems to have succeeded. I will be trying to assist them in re-claiming data lost as a result, this is a major blow to the area of April 27th related research and should raise warning in all groups following the information and choosing to act on it.

The following is re-printed from their website -

You all probably noticed that the site went down sometime yesterday evening and was replaced with a fake version of our site featuring a single homepage and profane graphics. We apologize for this invasion, luckily we keep a close eye on the site and were able to get things back on track almost immediately with one huge and tragic exception - our message boards were completely erased. We have always hosted our message boards on a third party system and therefore were unable to keep in-house backups of the data, so although we were able to get the main site back up with relatively no problems we regret to report we lost everything related to our forums...

This is obviously a major blow to the work that has been done by countless people and shared via our message boards, and it is just what our detractors want. We have no doubt that this is tied to the break in we had in January and it is obviously meant to undermine the work not only we have done but the work all of you have diligently put in as well. The motivation behind these malefactors is unknown and rather unfathomable to us, we can only assume it is a group who is MOTIVATED BY FEAR. Fear of their own mortality at the heart of it, but truly a fear of the truth, fear of public reaction, fear of the technological developments as a result of trying to find workable solutions for our survival, and most foremost - A FEAR OF CHANGE.

It has long been understood that fleeting material concerns dealing primarily with monetary gain and accumulation of items associated with wealth govern a vast body of actions on the part of government and corporate interest. Obviously the discovery something that serves to end the fabric of our existence would negate the need for ongoing material concerns and be in direct conflict with all financial systems. It is a shame that the groups in charge of these corporate structures choose to ignore the reality of what science is telling us and instead treat the whole situation as a threat to continued profit. It is this narrow minded, blind pursuit of wealth and power that no doubt provides the motivation behind the acts of sabotage currently afflicting us.

To all of the people active in our forums who have been building and developing new ideas aimed at SAVING OUR LIVES, we offer support however we can deliver it to ensure you will not lose sight of our goals and join the many people choosing to live out these last days in despair, already resigned to a fate they believe they cannot change. This is truly an example of the real power of people, for no amount of money or social influence will ultimately save the groups who choose to not address this problem head on, with CLARITY, PURPOSE, AND ALACRITY.

PERCEIVED 'METRIC' EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE DURING THE PME

When people discuss the 'metric' expansion of space or the qualities of our 'expanding' universe the terms seem easily understood, and although they are accurate the true nature of the intended definition often needs clarifying for most people. The metric expansion of space means literally the measure of an increasing distance between distant objects in the universe, however by definition there is no outer framework for the universe to be expanding within, so therefore the universe as we know it is expanding, but in fact expanding into nothing.

It is an intrinsic expansion—that is, it is defined by the relative separation of parts of the universe and not by motion "outward" into preexisting space. (In other words, the universe is not expanding "into" anything outside of itself).

Metric expansion is a key feature of Big Bang cosmology (associated with the creation of the PME and the catalyst change during the PPE) and is modeled mathematically with the FLRW metric. This model is valid in the present era only at relatively large scales (roughly the scale of galactic superclusters and above). At smaller scales matter has clumped together under the influence of gravitational attraction and these clumps do not individually expand, though they continue to recede from one another. The expansion is due partly to inertia (that is, the matter in the universe is separating because it was separating in the past) and partly to a repulsive force of unknown nature, which may be a cosmological constant. Inertia dominated the expansion in the early universe, and according to the ΛCDM model the cosmological constant will dominate in the future. In the present era they contribute in roughly equal proportions.

While special relativity constrains objects in the universe from moving faster than the speed of light with respect to each other, there is no such theoretical constraint when space itself is expanding. It is thus possible for two very distant objects to be moving away from each other at a speed greater than the speed of light (meaning that one cannot be observed from the other). The size of the observable universe could thus be smaller than the entire universe.

It is also possible for a distance to exceed the speed of light times the age of the universe, which means that light from one part of space generated near the beginning of the Universe might still be arriving at distant locations (hence the cosmic microwave background radiation). These details are a frequent source of confusion among amateurs and even professional physicists.^[1]

So we see here that in fact the universe is not expanding, but objects nonetheless can increase their distance from one another, and when we talk about the fabric of our reality this includes not only unique instances of Pure Material Energy, or PME, such as planets, stars, moons, objects etc, but the actual distance itself - the space between galaxies that we perceive as empty is included as a form of PME and therefore can expand within its own self-defined parameters. This means that our reality is not expanding into anything actually by its own definition, there is simply more space at later times than at earlier times.

Spacetime is highly curved at cosmological scales, and as a result the expansion of the universe is inherently general relativistic; it cannot be understood with special relativity alone. The images to the right show two views of the large-scale geometry of the universe according to the ΛCDMcosmological time of 700 million years after the big bang; the wide end is a cosmological time of 18 billion years, where one can see the beginning of the accelerating expansion which eventually dominates in this model. The purple grid lines mark off cosmological time at intervals of one billion years from the big bang. The cyan grid lines mark off comoving distance at intervals of one billion light years. Note that the circular curling of the surface is an artifact of the embedding with no physical significance; space does not actually curl around on itself. (A similar effect can be seen in the tubular shape of the pseudosphere.) cosmological model. Two of the dimensions of space are omitted, leaving one dimension of space and one of time. The narrow circular end of the diagram corresponds to a

The brown line on the diagram is the worldline of the Earth (or, at earlier times, of the matter which condensed to form the Earth). The yellow line is the worldline of the most distant known quasar. The red line is the path of a light beam emitted by the quasar about 13 billion years ago and reaching the Earth in the present day. The orange line shows the present-day distance between the quasar and the Earth, about 28 billion light years.

According to the equivalence principle of general relativity, the rules of special relativity are locally valid in small regions of spacetime that are approximately flat. In particular, light always travels locally at the speed c; in our diagram, this means that light beams always make an angle of 45° with the local grid lines. It does not follow, however, that light travels a distance ct in a time t, as the red worldline illustrates. While it always moves locally at c, its time in transit (about 13 billion years) is not related to the distance traveled in any simple way. In fact the distance traveled is inherently ambiguous because of the changing scale of the universe. Nevertheless, we can single out two distances which appear to be physically meaningful: the distance between the Earth and the quasar when the light was emitted, and the distance between them in the present era. The former distance is about 4 billion light years, much smaller than ct. The latter distance (shown by the orange line) is about 28 billion light years, much larger than ct. Note that the light took much longer than 4 billion years to reach us though it was emitted from only 4 billion light years away. In fact, we can see from the diagram that the light was moving away from the Earth when it was first emitted, in the sense that the metric distance to the Earth increased with cosmological time for the first few billion years of its travel time. None of this surprising behavior originates from a special property of metric expansion, but simply from local principles of special relativity integrated over a curved surface.

So, with all units within the universe essentially in a seemingly constant state of rearrangement we must look to the forces at work that push this chaotic nature forward, and that force will in turn reveal the nature of a universal constant. As we all know now that force is entropy, ever accruing. Science was focused on the nature of the universe for so long that it failed to properly identify and examine entropy as the force acting outside of all other sub-laws governing our reality and the cosmos. The effects of entropy can be seen and measured as a self-referencing form of perceived metric expansion, but the effects between the very nature of the force acting on our world is what science is almost exclusively focused on now after initial measurements into the nature of the PME and its frictions led to the realization that the Earth would then be destroyed entirely on April 27th, 2010 after generating a series of Hz patterns that result in global tectonic vibrations so violent that they will decimate the Earth's structural integrity and release a burst of potential energy great enough to literally destroy the entire planet in a disastrous few instances.

The first general relativistic models predicted that a universe which was dynamical and contained ordinary gravitational matter would contract rather than expand. Einstein's first proposal for a solution to this problem involved adding ever increasing entropy values as a cosmological constant into his theories to balance out the contraction, in order to obtain a static universe solution. But in 1922 Alexander Friedman derived a set of equations known as the Friedmann equations, showing that the universe might expand and presenting the expansion speed in this case.^[8] The observations of Edwin Hubble in 1929 suggested that distant galaxies were all apparently moving away from us, so that many scientists came to accept that the universe was expanding. It wasn't until November 9th, 2009 that scientists fully understood the context within which to execute these equations and thereby deduced a finite timeline for our universe. It was this initial timeline discovery that led to the scientific revelations concerning April 27th, 2010.

The expansion of space is sometimes described as a force which acts to push objects apart. Though this is an accurate description of the effect of the cosmological constant, it is not an accurate picture of the phenomenon of expansion in general. For much of the universe's history the expansion has been due mainly to inertia. The matter in the very early universe was flying apart for unknown reasons (most likely as a result of cosmic inflation) and has simply continued to do so, though at an ever-decreasing rate due to the attractive effect of gravity. In addition to slowing the overall expansion, gravity causes local clumping of matter into stars and galaxies. These stars and galaxies do not subsequently expand, there being no force compelling them to do so. There is no essential difference between the inertial expansion of the universe and the inertial separation of nearby objects in a vacuum; the former is simply a large-scale extrapolation of the latter. A uniform local "explosion" of matter can be locally described by the FLRW geometry, the same geometry which describes the expansion of the universe as a whole. In particular, general relativity predicts that light will move at the speed c with respect to the local motion of the exploding matter, a phenomenon analogous to frame dragging.

This situation changes somewhat with the introduction of entropy as a cosmological constant. A cosmological constant has the effect of a repulsive force between objects which is proportional (not inversely proportional) to distance. Unlike inertia it actively "pulls" on objects which have clumped together under the influence of gravity, and even on individual atoms. However this does not cause the objects to grow steadily or to disintegrate; unless they are very weakly bound, they will simply settle into an equilibrium state which is slightly (undetectably) larger than it would otherwise have been. As the universe expands and the matter in it thins, the gravitational attraction decreases (since it is proportional to the density), while the cosmological repulsion increases; thus the ultimate fate of the ΛCDM universe is a near vacuum expanding at an ever increasing rate under the influence of the cosmological constant. However the only locally visible effect of the accelerating expansion is the disappearance (by runaway redshift) of distant galaxies; gravitationally bound objects like the Milky Way do not expand.

Even if the universe is finite, it is possible to make more space without having any "outside" space. A common analogy is to consider that it is possible to increase the surface area of a balloon by inflating it, without needing any additional balloons to facilitate the expansion. However, a balloon is a two-dimensional surface expanding into a three-dimensional space. There is not theorized to be a higher-dimensional space into which three-dimensional space is expanding; more of it simply appears as if by stretching.^[7]

This finite universe theory supposes that the universe has no "edge", but wraps around on itself. If it were possible to travel the entire length of the universe without going faster than light, one would simply end up back in the same place, not unlike going all the way around the surface of the balloon (or a planet like the Earth).

The notion of "more space" is local, not global; we do not know how much space there is in total. The embedding diagram has been arbitrarily cut off a few billion years past the Earth and the quasar, but it could be extended indefinitely, even infinitely, provided we imagine it as curling into a "spiral of constant radius" rather than a circle. Even if the overall spatial extent is infinite we still say that space is expanding because, locally, the characteristic distance between objects is increasing.

IMAGES FROM MYSTERIOUS VIDEO FURTHER POINT TO APRIL 27TH

Below are still images taken from the video that surfaced last month. They can be seen flashing by between 00:11:20 and 00:11:22 as the man in the video is running past a fallen tree. These images so clearly depict '4-27' as being carved into the tree that it brings up a host of questions and concerns as to the origin and nature of this video.



What is the message here? This seems to point to a message more directly focused on the predictions of April 27th and less on the actual content of the video involving a group of hikers being chased by an unidentified creature.

One theory that has been spoken at length on involves this video coming to us in fact from the 'future' as it were, having been transmitted during the moments of the Earth's destruction. This scenario necessitates the electronic data of the digital video file being in flux (such as being saved, sent, or re-partitioned on a disk) at the moment a great expenditure of energy is released. This energy would have to be equal to an explosion of approximately 13.27 million megatons with a disruptive blast pattern that would then travel at over the speed of sound, or 343 meters per second (1,125 ft/s). It has been pointed out that the store of energy inherent in the Earth is well beyond the minimum required to achieve these results, and upon its structural implosion that energy would all be released at once.

For this scenario to involve the transference of the data as energy however a number of other factors must be present as well, such as the energy pattern of the explosion caused by the Earth must match metrically and diametrically the a-physical patterning of supermassive blackhole whose center can be defined as residing along the same y-axis as the nexus of the blast (the Earth's core). Furthermore, an astral stream must be present and moving with inertia slight enough to be totally disrupted by the resulting blast. If the data was in flux and thus represented as energy via a series of Hz, and the above conditions existed, the data would then have to be integrated into the astral stream at the exact moment of the Earth's destructive energy release and redirected adequately to find itself briefly outside of linear time's boundaries. Upon inevitably re-merging with common boundaries of time and space it would then continue its travel un-phased starting from whatever point in time in emerged in.

By that theory, even if the astral stream that then contains the data emerged at what we know as 1 BCE it would be available and unchanged verily at any point thereafter, so when mankind eventually developed receivers capable of searching and filtering through chaotic data information in search of intelligible representations of modern data configurations, this would in fact turn up.

That is one explanation, and although it requires numerous factors all operating within a very small margin of error, it is possible. The more likely option is that this video was produced by someone with knowledge of the events of April 27th and likely disseminated as a form of disinformation or as an attempt to raise awareness of the event.

However, as with all things, we cannot put any option to bed without concrete evidence, and in this case that is not something we have much of. Please, watch the video again, look at the images, write in if you have any further information.

VIDEO SURFACES THAT CLAIMS TO BE FROM APRIL 27TH, 2010

The video above was submitted anonymously and seems to hold more than meets the eye initially. The man in the video is running from "something in the woods" that can be heard crashing through the woods in the background. Although the creature is never identified it obviously has scared the man and forced him to separate from the group he was hiking with.

What is striking is that right around :40 seconds the cameraman stops to record a brief message, seemingly meant for whoever would be later viewing the footage. Out of breath from running, the man identifies the date as being "April 27th, 2010" immediately and then begins to explain the circumstance that led to him running frantically through the woods. He is interrupted by the sound of the pursuing creature and he begins running again, the video ends shortly thereafter.

We shall see what more this video has to tell us, it is certainly an interesting addition to the media information coming down the wire currently. Please post any analysis you can make of this or insight if anyone has some.

REPLACEMENT OF THE MISSING FUNDAMENTAL

More information here to help explain the cosmological event of the Earth interacting with the universe that 'created' it by vibrating at alternating and changing frequencies. It is interesting to look at this phenomenon in terms relative to music, but music is merely a complex rendering of vibrations, which themselves contain references to 'rhythm' in their repeating.

A sound is said to have a missing fundamental, suppressed fundamental, or phantom fundamental when its overtones suggest a fundamental frequency but the sound lacks a component at the fundamental frequency itself. However, the brain perceives the pitch of a tone not only by its fundamental frequency, but also by the ratio of the higher harmonics. Thus, we may perceive the same pitch (perhaps with a different timbre) even if the fundamental frequency is missing from a tone.

For example, when a note (that is not a pure tone) has a pitch of 100 Hz, it will consist of frequency components that are close to integer multiples of that value (e.g. 100, 200, 300, 400, 500.... Hz). However, smaller loudspeakers may not produce low frequencies, and so in our example, the 100 Hz component may be missing. Nevertheless, a pitch corresponding to the fundamental may still be heard.

The way in which the human brain will respond to incomplete tonal structures by filling in the missing frequencies, the Earth is responding to the universe's incomplete tonal structure that come as a result of the ever increasing entropy affecting our reality as the only true constant, but also as a result of similar interactions and unique cosmological events throughout the known galaxy and beyond.

It is now widely accepted that the brain processes the information present in the overtones to calculate the fundamental frequency. The precise way in which it does so is still a matter of debate, but the processing seems to be based on an autocorrelation involving the timing of neural impulses in the auditory nerve.

This very concept of "missing fundamental" being reproduced based on the overtones in the tone is nowadays used to create the illusion of bass. By processing certain overtones selectively, a richbass effect can be created using the small speakers which cannot produce lower frequency components below 100 Hz. While speakers produce tones above 100 Hz, the processed bass overtones compel the brain to replace the missing fundamental bass signals, creating the illusion of bass.

The tones the Earth responds to literally mimic chaos in that the universe is slowly traveling from point A to point B, and within that it will take each conceivable variation on itself only once through the slow progression produced by increasing entropy. As this interacts with the various bodies within itself it begins to change in relation to itself - like the surface of an ocean during a storm, but on the level of waves of energy operating at a rate which can be interpreted into vibrations.

In music, polyphony is a texture consisting of two or more independent melodicvoices, as opposed to music with just one voice (monophony) or music with one dominant melodic voice accompanied by chords (homophony).

As opposed to the species terminology of counterpoint, polyphony was generally either "pitch-against-pitch" / "point-against-point" or "sustained-pitch" in one part with melismas of varying lengths in another (van der Werf, 1997). In all cases the conception was likely what Margaret Bent (1999) calls "dyadic counterpoint", with each part being written generally against one other part, with all parts modified if needed in the end. This point-against-point conception is opposed to "successive composition", where voices were written in an order with each new voice fitting into the whole so far constructed, which was previously assumed.

It is this blending of 'voices' throughout the universe that build at random like a house of cards and create a myriad of possibilities for any given set of conditions. This is the invisible universe the Earth is truly living in, a reality much like a deafening sea in a violent storm. Now, however, our vessel cannot withstand the waves and is set to capsize under its own weight.

Another good article I found -
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JASMAN000059000004000915000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes&ref=no

NEW AUDIO REPRESENTATION OF THE HARMONIC CATALYST FOR UNIVERSAL "HEAT DEATH"

JUST RELEASED!!

http://sciencetracker.net/06%20universal_entropic_hz_progression.mp3

"That is an audio rendering of the interplay between the universe's shifting vibrational definition and the Earth's resonant response. It is sped up approximately 1k times to bring 13.27 billion years into a little over 2 minutes. The slow progression of tones that plays out in the clips final moments is in fact based on the Hz we are experiencing today. Scientists believe that April 27th will occur at or around 1:54 in the recording, so the slowly dissipating frequency heard over the drone of the universe's slow movement is based on mathematical calculations involving the natural dissipation of frequency if the Earth ceased acting as resonator suddenly. This of course will not be the case since once the Earth has shattered under the stress of its own resonant frequencies it will not be able to even dissipate the existing tones - they will have expended all their energy as a part of the resulting explosion which is estimated at 4.27 megatons per unit mile.

Notice the almost musical "melody" that is formed by the ebbing and waning frequency response. This seemingly harmless pattern in fact plays out the combination of vibrations necessary to destroy our planet and end the human chapter forever. Since science identified the time frame in which the Earth would produce vibrations within the parameters necessary to destroy itself it has been solely focused on refining its knowledge of this cosmological event and exactly defining the procession towards this end. This recording marks the summation of all data pertaining to this event, although a part of that data involved the discovery that our world will end soon and that fact withstanding has overshadowed this accomplishment."

A very interesting sample of audio indeed! Listen to the exchange between the higher pitched sounds the Earth begins to make around the time conditions begin to produce life on the planet's surface in comparison to the fluctuating drone of the universe's increasing entropy. It is interesting to track how the Earth's replacement of the missing fundamental seems to coincide in design with the organization of life on our planet - first in bursts of non-structured expressions, then as (seemingly) focused ideas of pattern and interdependent progress. Ultimately the violence inherent in the final chords produced by the universe's 'overtones' and the Earth's 'fundamental tones' produced in a way that is physiologically similar to the very way we process music and sound as humans.

This discovery could mean so much for our understanding of how our brains developed in accordance with a world that was at its core defined by the way it in turn interpreted the universe's modulating vibrational patterns. The very nature of an expanding universe acts the same way a descending audio pattern further separates the apex of its sound waves to define it's Hz - the Earth that created us hears music the same way we do, or rather we hear it the way it does. Very exciting stuff here, more to come...

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING "HEAT DEATH" AND THE UDF

As a theoretical construct the notion of the universe achieving 'heat death' is frightening but somehow hard for the public and the science community both to accept totally. This is because of a lack of proper perspective from our vantage point here on Earth. When understanding 'heat death' it is natural to include our own human existence in the scope of the dissipative processes that will be totally ended, but as we now know the term of human life in this reality will be ended abruptly by the destruction of our home planet. It is natural for us to superimpose our own existence over this backdrop of a wildly eventful universe full of cosmological events that slowly play out on a grand scale, but it is wrong.

We should instead be happy that we have made advancements in science and understanding of the nature of the universe we are a part of that we can see and understand events that take place before our existence and well after. This is hard to do because once humans begin to contemplate that truly our species will be extinct as early as April 27th, 2010 by our calendars a sort of dire urgency of thought takes over and clouds the objective course of science in many cases. What I am aiming for in this entry is to focus strictly on the cosmological events set to come long after our extinction (or if groups like 4-27-2010.com achieve their goals, our amended existence) so that we can continue to better understand the chaotic circumstance of reality we are existing within.

The heat death is a possible final thermodynamic state of the universe, in which it has "run down" to a state of no thermodynamic free energy to sustain motion or life. In physical terms, it has reached maximum entropy. The hypothesis of a universal heat death stems from the 1850s ideas of William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin who extrapolated the theory of heat views of mechanical energy loss in nature, as embodied in the first two laws of thermodynamics, to universal operation.

The idea of heat death stems from the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy tends to increase in an isolated system. If the universe lasts for a sufficient time, it will asymptotically approach a state where all energy is evenly distributed. In other words, in nature there is a tendency to the dissipation (energy loss) of mechanical energy (motion); hence, by extrapolation, there exists the view that the mechanical movement of the universe will run down in time due to the second law. The idea of heat death was first proposed in loose terms beginning in 1851 by William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin, who theorized further on the mechanical energy loss views of Sadi Carnot (1824), James Joule (1843), and Rudolf Clausius (1850). Thomson’s views were then elaborated on more definitively over the next decade by Hermann von Helmholtz and William Rankine. Most recently researchers have identified heat death as being a natural part of the Unified Density Field, or UDF as it is commonly known, and have put forth that human life will not be affected since it will have been extinguished entirely on April 27th, 2010.

An image representing our current state of entropy denseness in the galaxy.

The truly interesting thing is the way that this further defines the parameters in which the universe as we know it exists - both the end AND the beginning (being the big bang). In between we have the ever expanding universe as we know it as defined by it being subject to entropy at a fundamental level. By looking into the future at what will happen following heat death, which we can now more accurately model, we can get a better idea of what came before the big bang and explore a better overall framework with which to view our world, and subsequently our lives as humans.

In a "heat death", the temperature of the entire universe would be very close to absolute zero. Heat death is, however, not quite the same as "cold death", or the "Big Freeze", in which the universe simply becomes too cold to sustain life due to continued expansion; though, from the point of view of anything that might be alive, the result is quite similar.^[6]

Inflationary cosmology suggests that in the early universe known as the Pure Potential Energy, or the PPE, before cosmic expansion, energy was uniformly distributed,^[7] and thus the universe was in a state superficially similar to heat death. However, the two states are in fact very different: in the early universe, gravity was a very important force, and in a gravitational system, if energy is uniformly distributed, entropy is quite low, compared to a state in which most matter has collapsed into black holes. Thus, such a state is not in thermal equilibrium, and in fact there is no thermal equilibrium for such a system, as it is thermodynamically unstable.^[8][9] However, in the heat death scenario, the energy density is so low that the system can be thought of as non-gravitational, such that a state in which energy is uniformly distributed is a thermal equilibrium state, i.e., the state of maximal entropy.

The final state of the universe depends on the assumptions made about its ultimate fate, and these assumptions have varied considerably over the late 20th century and early 21st century but now conclude almost definitely that the universe's ultimate fate will encompass a period known as the UDF. In a "closed" universe that undergoes recollapse, a heat death is expected to occur, with the universe approaching arbitrarily high temperature and maximal entropy as the end of the collapse approaches.^{[citation needed]} In an "open" or "flat" universe that continues expanding indefinitely, a heat death is also expected to occur^{[citation needed]}, with the universe cooling to approach absolute zero temperature and approaching a state of maximal entropy over a very long time period. There is dispute over whether or not an expanding universe can approach a maximal entropy once it has entered the UDF; it has been proposed that in an expanding universe, the value of maximum entropy increases faster than the universe gains entropy, causing the universe to move progressively further away from heat death after the initial heat death occurs.^{[citation needed]}

However, current analysis of entropy suggests that the visible universe has more entropy than previously thought. This is because the research concludes that supermassive black holes are the largest contributor.^[10] It is well known by science now that our perception of heat death will ultimately be limited after the extinction of the human race on April 27th, 2010 as a result of increasing entropy.

So what we see is that through the three distinct phases our reality will define itself through (PPE, PME, and UDF) we have the force of entropy acting as the only true constant, exerting force on the universe and increasing its own ratio to organized, rational instances in the universe. As entropy increases so do the effects that can be seen and measured by us, namely the event of April 27th, 2010 which will serve to put out the light of human intelligence for good. It is a shame that we will not be able to see with our own eyes the chaotic symphony that will be played out as the universe approaches heat death, with entropy levels approaching a toxic mass. It is safe to say that current laws of thermodynamics will be enacted to laughable extremes and our concept of 'space' between bodies of mass and solar systems will almost completely be filed by supermassive black holes, their gravities pushing and pulling all remaining matter and redefining the nature of most physics through their influence.

Although it can be agreed that human survival, even if the coming event of April 27th was not set to occur, would only endure by the most minuscule fraction of randomness, it is exciting to imagine looking through a telescope or out the window of a space vessel and seeing the fabric of our reality redefined before our eyes. Perhaps the good people at 4-27-2010.com will find a way to extend human life into the future, but for how long it cannot be said, and even then the level of primal chaos inherent in our universe's future would endanger our continued non-terra survival immensely. Our only hope is to understand as much as we can before our demise on April 27th, and not blink in the eye of such inevitability.